Skip to main content

SC stays Criminal Proceedings against M.S. Dhoni in Lord Vishnu Ad case



Visit our website: www.onlinelawsolutions.com

Subscribe our updates on tax/law: Click Here


The Apex Court on Friday stayed the criminal proceedings pending before an Andhra Pradesh court against ODI captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni in a case lodged against him for allegedly portraying himself as Lord Vishnu in an advertisement. Dhoni is currently touring in Australia in a five ODI and three T20 series against the hosts from January 12th to January 31st.

A bench led by Justice Dipak Misra issued a notice to complainant Yerraguntla Shyam Sundar, who had asked for invocation of penal charges against Dhoni for allegedly hurting religious sentiments. The court also issued a notice on transfer of the criminal case from the court in Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, to Bengaluru in Karnataka, where a similar case is pending. It will hear the case after eight weeks.


Dhoni’s troubles relating to the matter dates back to 2013 when a case was registered by Choori Khan, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) of a local court in Bangalore, under section 295 (injuring or defiling place of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class) along with 34 of the Indian Penal Code on a complaint filed by social activist Jayakumar Hiremath. The picture had appeared on the cover of the April 2013 edition of the Business Today magazine with the subtitle “God of Big Deals” relating to Dhoni’s success as an advertising brand. Further trouble ensued as a local court in the Anantpur district of Andhra Pradesh issued an arrest warrant against the popular cricketer in 2014 after Yerraguntla Shyam Sundar, a local leader of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), had filed a petition in the court in February alleging that the cricketer hurt the sentiments of Hindus by denigrating a Hindu god. The Supreme Court had stayed criminal proceedings and had also stayed the operation of Karnataka HC order which had refused to stall proceedings against him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

Visit our website:  www.onlinelawsolutions.com Subscribe our updates on tax/law:  Click Here CS Urja Mahesh Karia Audit of ‘Internal   Financial controls   (hereinafter to be referred as ‘IFC’) over Financial Reporting’ is a reasonably advanced reporting concept for India. In India though there were no such requirements earlier, however, similar reporting requirements existed globally such as section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002 of USA. Initially when majority of the Sections of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act’) were notified along with Section 143(3)(i), there was lot of ambiguity not only on part of the company but also on the part of the auditors regarding the actual reporting. Later on, MCA has notified the   Companies (Audit & Auditors) Amendment Rules, 2014   and introduced new Rule 10A. Further, ICAI has also issued Guidance Notes on 14 th   September 2015 and both of these steps...

Transfer of shareholding on basis of disputed MOU was clear act of oppression by respondent

Visit our website:  www.onlinelawsolutions.com Subscribe our updates on tax/law:   Click Here   Where respondent group on basis of a disputed MOU with appellant group had held board meeting, issued duplicate shares and transferred shareholding of appellant group in its favour at valuation which was not acceptable to appellant group, action of respondent group was a clear calculated act of grossest oppression INTRODUCTION 3. The dispute pertains to the control and management of M/s. SAF Yeast Company Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as SAF Yeast), a Private Limited Company, having registered office at 419, Swastik Chambers, Chembur, Mumbai. SAF Yeast has one plant in Chiplun, Maharashtra and another at Sandhila, Uttar Pradesh. SAF Yeast is a joint venture company. The joint venture is between Nafan B.V. and Mr.Arunachalam Muthu and M/s.Helios Food Additives Pvt. Ltd. SAF Yeast carries on business of manufacture of yeast and is a dealer and expor...

Son Attaining majority disentitles him from receiving maintenance from his father: Sikkim HC

Visit our website:  www.onlinelawsolutions.com Subscribe our updates on tax/law:   Click Here Thus, if a child whether legitimate or illegitimate has attained majority as per the aforesaid Act of 1875 and is not suffering by any physical or mental abnormality or injury, thereby unable to maintain itself, would not be entitled to receive maintenance u/S. 125, the Court said. High Court of Sikkim has set aside an order by Family court which had enhanced maintenance to ‘son’ who had attained majority. On the Revision petition filed by ‘Father’, Chief Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha, held that provisions of Section 127 of Code of Criminal Procedure are always subject to the provisions of Section 125 and as the major son, ceases to be entitled to receive maintenance under section 125, he cannot seek an order of enhancement under section 127. Facts and contentions In this case, The Family Court, had enhanced the aforesaid amount of monthly maintenance from Rs....